?> First : civil war. 2nd : civil war. 3rd : civil war... The pseudo "DrRocket"
* * *

Search

Nous agissons comme contrôle qualité externe et incorruptible.
Chacun peut nous faire des remontrances. Le devoir de résipiscence s'applique à tous.
Bienvenue, Invité. Merci de vous connecter ou de vous inscrire.
Avez-vous perdu votre e-mail d'activation ?
décembre 15, 2017, 12:12:57

Connexion avec identifiant, mot de passe et durée de la session

Shoutbox

1 Invité, 0 Membres

Auteur Sujet: First : civil war. 2nd : civil war. 3rd : civil war... The pseudo "DrRocket"  (Lu 1777 fois)

Jacques

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Messages: 805
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:52 pm    Post subject: Re: Gravity
Citation de: DrRocket
Citation de: Farsight
... by M B  van der Mark and G W ’t Hooft.
...
Crank

Reasoning by insults...


Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:59 pm    Post subject:
Citation de: DrRocket
Citation de: Farsight
See Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon its Energy-Content? ...

Crank

...
You are a delusional nut job pretending to be sane.  No education in and no knowledge of real physics.  Just a self-published book of nonsense and a television appearance on a British conspiracy show.
Crank.



Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:04 pm    Post subject: Re: Compton effect: Schrödinger's treatment
Citation de: DrRocket
Citation de: Farsight
Interesting, regel...

...
Crank
Added to your record.


Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:15 pm    Post subject: Re: If I was wrong on that matter,
Citation de: DrRocket
Citation de: J.C. Lavau
Can reasoning by insults replace scientific methods ?
...
...a troll.


Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Breaching the trust of the students
Citation de: DrRocket
Citation de: J.C. Lavau
... B.L. Van der Waerden in its "Sources of Quantum Mechanics" (1967 North-Holland, 1968 Dover).
...
...Crank.
...

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Breaching the trust of the students
Citation de: DrRocket
Citation de: J.C. Lavau
A far more convenient method, to bend the History to your needs, is to use the Memory Hole, as used by  B.L. Van der Waerden in its "Sources of Quantum Mechanics" (1967 North-Holland, 1968 Dover).

The only one pushing distortions  here is you. Crank
Added to your record.


Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:48 pm    Post subject:

Citation de: DrRocket
Citation de: des.red35
...

Please ignore Lavau. He is a troll with a (warped) personal agenda.
Are reasoning by insults and harassing the others, scientific methods ?
« Modifié: juin 20, 2011, 01:35:33 by Jacques »
La science se distingue des autres modes de transmission des connaissances, par une croyance de base : nous croyons que les experts sont faillibles, que les connaissances transmises peuvent contenir toutes sortes de fables et d’erreurs, et qu’il faut prendre la peine de vérifier, par des expériences

Jacques

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Messages: 805
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:05 pm    Post subject: The formalism is correct, though more obscure than necessary
Citation de: J.C. Lavau
Citation de: Farsight
Try the copy here: http://www.cybsoc.org/electron.pdf
Not better anyway.

But you are in a blind alley, there.
Any pretty picture MUST retrieve the same predictions, or even better predictions, than the actual formalism, using Pauli matrices, and Dirac matrices for instance.

The formalism is correct, though more obscure than necessary.
The semantics wraping it, is rubbish.

The formalism is strictly undulatory, and strictly determinist.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 12:14 am    Post subject: Re: Please return to the subject : waves of fermions.
Citation de: DrRocket
.What we have here folks is a psychologist masquerading as a scientist, with an agenda of some imagined slight of de Broglie, and probably Dabid Bohm as well, regarding interpretations of quantum mechanics.

..underneath it all is the distasteful and counter-productive agenda which he has here clearly revealed.

deBroglie-Bohm theory is one interpretation of QM.  It is not "wrong".  But neither is it the only valid interpretation. It is not suppressed.  It is just not widely adopted, though it is widely known.   Real physics is not dogmatic, despite what Lavau imagines.

There are classes and legitimate internet sites available to those who are interested.  Nothing is being suppressed.

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/Scientific/Courses/Introduction_to_the_de_Broglie-Bohm_Theory/

http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~mdt26/pilot_waves.html

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 7:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Please return to the subject : waves of fermions.
Citation de: DrRocket
Citation de: J.C. Lavau
Citation de: DrRocket
... and probably Dabid Bohm as well...
Please do not hesitate to prove your statement.

There is nothing to prove.  The subject theory is widely known as the de Broglie-Bohm theory.

You have been outed and debunked.  End of discussion.


Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Please return to the subject : waves of fermions.
Citation de: DrRocket
Citation de: J.C. Lavau
Now we have all the written proves that I was discussing with a mad.

For those who are not, nothing is more simple than to search the word "Bohm" on the site :
http://deonto-ethics.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Sp%C3%A9cial%3ARecherche&search=Bohm&go=Lire
The search finds five occurrences :
Four are in the expression "Aharanov-Bohm experiment" : "Dans une expérience type Aharonov-Bohm, où un électron interfère si ...".
And the fifth is under the signature of Didier Lauwaert, where he admits that David Bohm was a corpuscularist. It was in a discussion in August 2007, on the Usenet group fr.sci.physique.

This accuser is a delirious paranoic. He had rather to consult a specialist, in his town
.

Psychologist, heal thyself.

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/Scientific/Courses/Introduction_to_the_de_Broglie-Bohm_Theory/

http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~mdt26/pilot_waves.html


Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 2:52 am    Post subject: Re: Thank you for the perfidy...
Citation de: DrRocket
de Broglie-Bohm theory is a perfectly respectable, albeit minority, interepretation of quantum mechanics.  Your "conspiracy" is pure fiction.


Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 4:42 am    Post subject: Re: Breaching the trust of the students
Citation de: DrRocket
You attempt to impose paradigms of classical behavior on the quantum world.
La science se distingue des autres modes de transmission des connaissances, par une croyance de base : nous croyons que les experts sont faillibles, que les connaissances transmises peuvent contenir toutes sortes de fables et d’erreurs, et qu’il faut prendre la peine de vérifier, par des expériences

Jacques

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Messages: 805
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:17 pm    Post subject:
Citation de: DrRocket
Rubbish.

This is just nuts.



Ignore Lavau's comments.  He doesn't know what he is talking about.
Where ?
http://www.thescienceforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=31379
« Modifié: juin 21, 2011, 09:30:30 by Jacques »
La science se distingue des autres modes de transmission des connaissances, par une croyance de base : nous croyons que les experts sont faillibles, que les connaissances transmises peuvent contenir toutes sortes de fables et d’erreurs, et qu’il faut prendre la peine de vérifier, par des expériences

Jacques

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Messages: 805
Disparu, "thescienceforum.com",
« Réponse #3 le: mars 21, 2017, 07:48:49 »
Disparu, "thescienceforum.com", où l'on raisonnait par insultes, et je ne le regretterai pas.
La science se distingue des autres modes de transmission des connaissances, par une croyance de base : nous croyons que les experts sont faillibles, que les connaissances transmises peuvent contenir toutes sortes de fables et d’erreurs, et qu’il faut prendre la peine de vérifier, par des expériences

 

Recent

Membres
  • Total des membres: 51
  • Latest: Stan
Stats
  • Total des messages: 805
  • Total des sujets: 326
  • Online Today: 4
  • Online Ever: 57
  • (octobre 09, 2014, 06:30:06)
Membres en ligne
Users: 0
Guests: 1
Total: 1